So I was posting some of my reviews onto Hulu the other day. One of the first reviews I tried was for "Bathroom Humor," and I criticized the fart and poop jokes. I was surprised to see that my review was rejected because my use of the word "poop" had been deemed inappropriate.
I thought about it for a moment.
Hulu, as you may not know, has clips with profanity and nudity contained within them (I know where they are, but you'll have to find them yourself). Was this a double standard?
I decided that no, it was not.
The clips all come with a rating, and a warning that it is mature content. There's no way for an obscenity-sensitive individual to navigate through the reviews without accidentally seeing profanity.
Banning the word "poop" was maybe going a little far, but the general concept was sound. Hilariously, when I replaced the word poop with "poo," it passed muster.
Then it got even more ridiculous.
I next reviewed a cooking show, and when I attempted to post my review, I was told that my use of the word "shit" was unacceptable. But wait just a minute here! I hadn't used that word (although I had panned the show). What was going on here?
It turned out that the obscenity-screening software they're using had picked up on my use of the word "shitake," a word that was used in the episode description.
So I understand that an up-and-coming website has to be careful about what image it portrays to the public. But I think Hulu has to relax a little here.
They have to tame their cyber-pitbull if they want to be seen as free-speech friendly.
Otherwise, it's just bullshitake.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment